Tuesday, 19 January 2016

World tennis has been ripe for match-fixing

SYDNEY: Big financial incentives for gamblers, small tournaments of little consequence to top players and the ease of fixing the outcome of a one-on-one sport have helped turn world tennis into a haven for match-fixers, according to experts and industry insiders.
Tennis was rocked on Monday by allegations that the game´s authorities have failed to deal with widespread match-fixing, just as the Australian Open, the first grand slam tournament of the year, kicked off in Melbourne.
Multiple sources told Reuters that the revelation was no surprise to those who closely follow the sport, where, out of the spotlight at small tournaments around the world, the temptations are obvious and malfeasance very difficult to prove.
Dozens of untelevised tournaments are held annually and top players often inexplicably lose to relatively unknown opponents, said Steve Georgakis, a senior lecturer at the University of Sydney, who is researching match-fixing in tennis.
"If you have a look at the big tournaments, the Opens or Olympic Games, you´ll notice that in a lot of these tournaments the favourite usually wins," he said.
But at a small tournament the following week, how could anyone prove that a top 50 player didn´t lose because they were exhausted or injured, said Georgakis.
A highly ranked player is almost certain to be the odds-on favourite to win in these small tournaments and thus has the greatest opportunity to make money by intentionally losing to an outmatched player, handing a big payoff to those behind the fix.
"It´s a one-on-one sport and what you do is, you´re the favourite and you get a few other people to load up on the other player to win and then you throw the match.
And you can never get caught," Georgakis added.
Sports betting has exploded in recent years with the proliferation of online and mobile gambling sites, and could be worth as much as $3 trillion annually, Patrick Jay, an independent betting expert, told the United Nations in 2015.
In that sea of money, tennis is the second most active betting market, trailing only soccer, research conducted by the European Gaming and Betting Association shows.
Betting on tennis is relatively simple and comes with enormous potential payoffs, a professional tennis gambler told Reuters under the condition of anonymity.
Many bookmakers have created disincentives to bet point-by-point or game-by-game with limits on those types of bets, pushing gamblers towards the payoffs for a winning bet on the overall match.
"Say you want to throw a game but win the match, why would you bother? You can only win a couple of thousand of dollars," the gambler said.
Bookmakers are obliged to report suspicious betting patterns to the Tennis Integrity Unit, which was set up to police illegal activities in world tennis.
But a source at a major bookmaker told Reuters under the condition of anonymity that it is ultimately up to the authorities to act.
"Most money is won by betting on the favourite, which is not a good result for bookmakers," he added.
"But if he´s up one set to love and then, in play, people start betting on the outsider…that would be us getting on the front foot, most likely, to say (to the authorities) ´is there anything you need for us to look into?´," the bookmaker said.

Amir Khan to take on Garcia-Guerrero fight winner

ISLAMABAD: British boxer of Pakistan origin Amir Khan who holds a record 31-3 with 19 knockouts will be the mandatory challenger for the winner of the fight between Danny Garcia and Roberto Guerrero scheduled to be held on Saturday.
After Floyd Mayweather Jr. announced his retirement last September the title was vacated.
Garcia and Guerrero will be fist to fist on January 23 for the said vacant WBC welterweight title at the Staples Center in Los Angeles California.
In their official announcement WBC said Danny Garcia vs. Robert Guerrero will fight for the WBC welterweight championship.
Amir Khan is ratified as (WBC) mandatory contender.
Lamont Peterson vs. Andre Berto for a final elimination bout to determine the second mandatory website www.vinereport.com, reported on Tuesday.
The decision of the organization met criticisms including comments from ESPN analyst Dan Rafael.
Although the lineup looks more favorable for Khan he is more focused on Guerrero getting another chance with the title after his several attempts in the past.
He said Anyone with remote knowledge of recent results would have to scratch their head with regard to Guerrero getting a title shot when you consider he had his clock cleaned in a one sided loss to Keith Thurman in March for another organization s welterweight title.
Guerrero currently holds a record of 33-3 1 with 18 knockouts but was easily defeated by Mayweather Jr. in their welterweight title bout in 2013. He also had another chance to get the title from a different organization with his fight against Keith Thruman last March and a close shave with Aaron Martinez in June.
He was as lucky as whomever will win the Powerball jackpot when he was given a generous split decision against Aaron Martinez in June but even if you can stomach Guerrero in a world title fight the WBC clearly is violating its rules since it only ranks Guerrero sixth Rafael added.
Meanwhile in case Garcia gets the win it will be the second time that he and Khan will fight against a title.
Garcia who holds the record 31-0 with 18 knockout victories already fought with Khan for the junior welterweight title in 2012.